Refugee Status Dept: The new category would have allowed claimants who arrived in a large group to be detained for two weeks rather than the usual 48 hours before their first hearing before the Immigration and Refugee Board. To put the 500 Tamils in perspective, about 30,000 people claim refugee status every year in Canada, according to Montreal Gazette. Fortunately, the prime minister rejected the proposal on Tuesday, choosing instead to focus on the smugglers. These smugglers profit from other people's misery, secure in the knowledge that Canada's strict legal procedures mean claimants will remain in the country, at least for a while. But as tempting as it is to tailor-make legislation to deal with people-smugglers, Canada already has laws that can be used against them. The real challenge is to get hold of them, especially if they remain offshore and but the people they were smuggling, people so frantic to flee that they are willing to hand over everything they own to get somewhere safe, were never a fair target. Yet as recently as Tuesday, this was a distinction that was lost on members of the Conservative government. They proposed creating a new category of "mass arrival" refugee claimant in the wake of the arrival of nearly 500 Tamil refugees off the coast of British Columbia last month. Mass-arrival claimants would have been turned into a lower category of less-believable refugee claimants simply because of the method they used to leave their homeland. Canadian legal scholars were fast to point out the unfairness of subverting people's constitutional and human rights in that way. As
reported in the news.
@t tamil refugees, immigration and refugee