Anti-Refugee Rhetoric: Election Spills and Refugee Families

anti-refugee rhetoric: The measures include requiring resettlement agencies to carry insurance that would defray the cost of prosecuting refugees who commit violent crimes and allowing towns and cities to request a moratorium on resettlements in their communities, according to Brandon Sun. Refugee rights advocates say those measures are a sign of what is to come as the anti-refugee rhetoric that featured prominently in the presidential election spills over to statehouses and local governments. In Montana, which took in just nine refugee families from January to early December, about a dozen bill requests related to refugees, immigration and terrorism have been filed ahead of next month's session. It's pretty widely known that this is going to be a hard year for those of us who are seeking to protect the rights of refugees and immigrants, said S.K. Rossi, advocacy and policy director for the ACLU of Montana. Some down-ticket conservative candidates took Trump's cue and integrated the anti-refugee platform into their campaigns. The president-elect campaigned on building a border wall with Mexico to stop illegal immigration, deporting immigrants who are in the nation illegally and halting the resettlement of refugees to strengthen the federal program that vets them. (www.immigrantscanada.com). As reported in the news.